2025年10月31日 星期五

莫內起初並不情願去威尼斯,但最終威尼斯還是吸引了他。Paris Rediscovers Monet’s Magic at Grand Palais


莫內起初並不情願,但威尼斯最終還是吸引了他。

即便是在度假期間,這位法國印象派之父也無法抗拒光學和藝術史的魅力。布魯克林一場盛大的展覽或許能讓你明白個中緣由。

布魯克林博物館為這場名為「莫內與威尼斯」的展覽重新匯集了19幅莫奈的畫作,這是自1912年伯恩海姆-傑恩畫廊舉辦「威尼斯」展覽並將這些作品分散給收藏家以來,規模最大的一次對莫奈晚期創作歷程的回顧展。從這些作品來看,莫內被威尼斯獨特的光線濃度和夢幻般的水景深深吸引。誰又能抵擋得住呢?

然而,這場雄心勃勃的展覽真正的貢獻,同時也是它的不足之處,在於它透過展出莫內同時代及之前其他藝術家的70件作品,展現了莫奈在創作過程中可能面臨的那些不易察覺的挑戰。策展人認為,這些與認可和藝術史有關的挑戰直擊他的技藝核心,並激勵他以一種能夠使他後來的、更具標誌性的睡蓮作品獲得巨大成功的方式去玩轉水和固體。

A Monet painting of the Grand Canal in Venice, with hazy buildings in the background of the water.
Claude Monet. “The Grand Canal, Venice,” 1908, oil on canvas. When Monet and his wife arrived in Venice, they hired gondolas down the Grand Canal. “I’m too old to paint such beautiful things,” he told her.Credit...via Brooklyn Museum


Monet Was Reluctant. Venice Seduced Him.

Even on vacation, the father of French impressionism couldn’t resist the pull of optics and art history. A lush blockbuster show in Brooklyn helps you see why.




If you judge by the 19 paintings the Brooklyn Museum has reunited for the lush and greedy “Monet and Venice,” the largest survey of this detour in Monet’s late career since Galerie Bernheim-Jeune’s “Venise” exhibition scattered these works to collectors in 1912, you’ll see that what grabbed him were the special density of the light there and the dreamlike supremacy of water. How could they not?

But it is the real contribution of this ambitious show, and also its liability, to imagine the less obvious challenges that must have faced Monet, by arraying 70 other works by different artists of his time and before him. These challenges, to do with recognition and art history, cut to the heart of his craft and emboldened him, the curators argue, to play with water and solids in a way that would make his later, more iconic water lilies so successful.



20101005
CRITIC’S NOTEBOOK

Paris Rediscovers Monet’s Magic at Grand Palais

Jacques Demarthon/Agence France-Presse

A visitor takes in two views of the House of Parliament by Claude Monet at the current show at the Grand Palais in Paris.


Related

PARIS — Poor Claude Monet.

Blog

ArtsBeat

The latest on the arts, coverage of live events, critical reviews, multimedia extravaganzas and much more.Join the discussion.

Like white noise, he’s everywhere and invisible, the staple of countless dentists’ offices. Old hat for more than a century now. Is it too late to recapture some of the shock and thrill that caused horrified Parisians in the 1870s to perceive his work as “leprous”?

Amazingly, no, it’s not. The Monet show that just opened here at the Grand Palais is a start. The biggest art spectacle in Europe this fall, with some 160 paintings, it is, believe it or not, the first full-dress overview Paris has staged in decades, the first chance anywhere to see the whole sweep of his work in some time. The French are treating it like a national celebration. President Nicolas Sarkozy contributed a note to the catalog extolling this “unmistakable emblem of the international influence of French culture.” The exhibition would have been a box office smash even if it had corralled fewer of Monet’s benchmarks.

It happens to be ravishing.

Monet the populist decorator of candle-in-Chianti-bottle bistros and college dormitories is modernism’s prettiest painter, a virtuoso of picturesque country scenes and ephemeral weather but not an especially heavyweight thinker or troublemaker. Clichés about him as a wandering minstrel in a white beard trailed like the Pied Piper by children toting his canvases across hill and dale haven’t exactly toughened his reputation, either.

This show, surveying his long career and probing its depths, helps restore something of his original status. He comes across as more than the familiar Impressionist — he comes across as a painter of strange and elusive probity, of memory and reflection, as an artist seeking not just to simulate sun, rain and snow, but states of mind as well. He gave form to “the heavenly pasturage our minds can find in things,” is how Proust once put it.

In part he did this by returning again and again, as the exhibition stresses, to certain sites and motifs, completing pictures not on the spot, but often in his studio, based on what he remembered.

All this is hardly news, and to make the case, pictures in the show are hung, albeit a bit confusingly, by subject as opposed to chronologically, with occasional pedestrian ones from haunts like Vétheuil and Antibes. Monet became a very rich man churning out 2,000 works, and one need only hop the Métro to the Musée Marmattan Monet to see, among some great paintings, plenty of absolute stinkers.

That said, it would be churlish to belabor the exhibition’s failings. Intelligence and sobriety befit an artist too glibly thought of as easy. In the flesh, his best works, it turns out, thwart the problem of their own endless reproduction by being, well, irreproducible. You just can’t grasp the bejeweled, darkling purple and pink light emanating from the moody reveries of Venice he painted well on in his career except by standing before them. They’re views steeped in Whistler, Turner and a kind of exquisite sadness. Only planted in front of “Bathers at La Grenouillère” can you properly get the squinting effect of slanting sun splashing off rippled water, ripe with summer dreams and visual puns, that blurs the silhouettes of figures in the middle distance.

His path was never straight from material realism toward greater abstraction. Conditions dictated style. Steam rising through the gloom at the Gare St-Lazare called for gossamer curlicues of pink and white on smeared patches of gray-blue pigment one day. The next, a sharp spring sun across the Quai du Louvre demanded more crystalline clarity.

And before the awesome rock portal at Étretat, Monet elected dots and dashes to connote raw nature and a swift wind. The style, precisely what shocked and appalled old-school Parisians, masqueraded as an instant take on the subject. Former fishing villages on the Norman coast like Étretat were already turning into resorts catering to vacationing urbanites who wanted to experience such places as if unspoiled by people like themselves.

Indulging such self-delusions, the painter created not just spontaneous records of unblemished countryside, but also heightened versions of vistas and monuments unspoiled and so beckoning that, faced with the real thing, a natural instinct was to reconcile truth to fiction, rather than the other way around.

I mean that Monet’s visions of places can come to inhabit and even supplant our direct memories of them. At Rouen, he doesn’t just capture the cathedral in shifting conditions. He seizes on the way that memory, associated with a place or image, experienced at a certain time and in a certain mood, triggers bundles of emotions and lodges itself in the mind as a kernel of pleasure and pain. Classic Impressionism, as a mere meteorological affair, misses the point. Abstraction does, too.

Monet was really painting mental states, states of reflection. His late, sublime “Water Lilies” is literally that: reflections of light, clouds and foliage against the surface of his pond at Giverny, Monet’s erotic, mysterious, multicolored abyss of shimmering, indefinite space, which kind of describes memory itself.

What makes these pictures look so modern has partly to do, as every art museum docent points out, with their lack of foreground and background and the obvious debt to Japan. But mostly it’s to do with the aspiration to render the intangible — to make millions of material facts immaterial and unshackle them from time. Giverny was both his Eden and object lesson. There, Monet could see the daily transience of things saved from oblivion only by memory and by art.

There’s a photograph he took of himself around 1905, when he was in his mid-60s. In it, he’s standing on the edge of his lily pond, his head casting a shadow on the sunlit water. Lilies float above. The effect is a little disorienting. A temptation is to imagine we’re looking up at Monet, so that the lilies become clouds and the pond, sky. It’s akin to the “Water Lilies,” where the horizon line dissolves and where it’s hard to tell whether the view depicted is across the water, from above it or even from underneath. But in this case he’s in the picture.

By the way, it’s an interesting question, Monet and the camera. He loved new things. He followed balloonists and boat racers the way sports fans now track baseball and football scores. He became an automobile enthusiast, buying one of the first Panhard-Levassor motor cars, with leather upholstery. The occasional photo aside, why not the camera? What did it lack, besides color?

Perhaps photographs seemed to him too literal, too far from the interior states that were his real project. We can make out his beard and profile under the familiar wide-brimmed hat in his photograph. It conjures up other images we have of him as stout, natty, in tweed suit, cambric shirt and ankle boots, a human brandy snifter. His photograph, although a jeu d’esprit, exudes a whiff of melancholy because like all photographs it’s a reminder, with that shadow, of something gone except in the picture and our recollections of it. Monet managed in the photograph what he exalted in paint: the effervescent pleasure of seeing and the inevitable disappearance of that pleasure.

No wonder Proust revered him. Proust also wrote that his pictures “make us adore a field, a sky, a beach, a river as though these were shrines which we long to visit, shrines we lose faith in when we see.” Reality, with its mess and noise, fails to live up to what Monet painted.

But Proust also meant that Monet didn’t just idealize places; he wasn’t just a French weatherman with paints. He showed us Argenteuil and Belle-Île, the Houses of Parliament in London and the banks of the Seine, vibrating with electric color, “parts of the world,” as Proust said, “that are themselves and nothing but themselves,” places that already existed in our imagination, as if waiting to be discovered and that now bid for our affection.

“On the threshold of love we are bashful,” Proust noted. “There has to be someone who will say to us, ‘Here is what you may love: love it.’ ”

Monet does exactly that.

And how can we not?

2025年10月28日 星期二

Jackie Ferrara (1929 u2025 aged 95)best known for her pyramidal stacked structures.





Jackie Ferrara (1929 u2025 aged 95)best known for her pyramidal stacked structures.

Jackie Ferrara in 2025. Whether she was making a small sculpture or a large public work, she remained the most craft-obsessed of Minimalists.Credit...Deborah Solomon

Skip to contentSkip to site indexSection Navigation


Account



Jackie Ferrara, Artist Who Brought Mystery to Minimalism, Dies at 95

While others made sleek metallic sculptures, she favored humble materials like lumber and glue. The Times called her “one of our most gifted and inventive sculptors.”


Jackie Ferrara in 2025. Whether she was making a small sculpture or a large public work, she remained the most craft-obsessed of Minimalists.Credit...







“Minneapolis Project,” a 14-foot-tall truncated pyramid at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design, was completed in the late 1970s.Credit...Deborah Solomon

Jackie Ferrara (born Jacqueline Hirschhorn, November 17, 1929 – October 22, 2025) was an American sculptor and draftswoman best known for her pyramidal stacked structures.

Jackie Ferrara

Ferrara in 2012
Born
Jacqueline Hirschhorn
November 17, 1929

Detroit, Michigan, United States
Died October 22, 2025 (aged 95)

Basel, Switzerland
Education Michigan State University
Known for Sculpture
Movement Postminimalism
Website Official website





A177 XF 1 3/4 – XS 5/8 – V, A 1 1/4 – V, A 1 (1977), M128 CRA Pyramid (1974), and A188 Pylon (1978) at The Phillips Collection in 2022


2025年10月24日 星期五

Georg Baselitz (1938- ) Georg Baselitz 80歲 (2018);donated seven works to the museum in Munich









 Georg Baselitz (1938- ) Georg Baselitz 80歲 (2018);donated seven works to the museum in Munich


Georg Baselitz (1938- )沒現身在The Oxford Companion to Twentieth Century Art.


IN GERMANY, THE NEW EUROPEAN Painters have addressed themselves directly or indirectly to the problems of postwar Europe. How can the ancient structures of European society be put back into repair? What is the role of friends and family? Can short-lived amours give us a sense of our own identity? Or is the daydream a better guide? Can everyday things have something to teach us? If so, how can that something be set out in painting?

Someone who has tussled with these questions is Georg Baselitz, who was born Georg Kern in 1938 in a village called Deutschbaselitz in Saxony. After Saxony was overrun by the Russians, he stuck it out in the East until he was old enough to move to Berlin. Bent on making art, he took half the name of his birthplace, by way of a keepsake, and enrolled in the art schools of the former German capital.



National Gallery of Art


Georg Baselitz has come to be regarded as a pioneer in the renewal of figurative painting and as a founder of the so-called international neo-expressionist movement. In the late 1950s Baselitz began to develop his own style of figurative painting, challenging the orthodoxy of abstraction in the twentieth century. Baselitz produced a group of paintings from 1965 to 1966, which he called his Helden or Hero paintings, of which “Man in the Moon—Franz Pforr” is an early example.





Georg Baselitz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Baselitz







Georg Baselitz (born 23 January 1938) is a German painter. He studied in East Germany, before moving to what was then West Germany. Baselitz's style is ...




In October 1963, the work, as well as the picture Der nackte Mann, shown in the West Berlin gallery Werner & Katz, was seized by the public prosecutor's office because ofimmorality. The criminal proceedings ended in 1965 with the return of the pictures.[citation needed]





Die große Nacht im Eimer

Artist Georg Baselitz
Year 1963
Type oil on canvas
Dimensions 250 cm × 180 cm (98 in × 71 in)
Location Museum Ludwig, Cologne



MoMA | The Collection | Georg Baselitz (German, born 1938)

www.moma.org/collection/artist.php?artist_id=366


German painter, draughtsman, printmaker and sculptor. After attending grammar school in Kamenz, near Dresden, he began studying painting at the ...


http://www.britishmuseum.org/whats_on/exhibitions/germany_divided.aspx




Germany divided
Baselitz and his generation

From the Duerckheim Collection
6 February – 31 August 2014
Free

Room 90 /Open late Fridays




Featuring over 90 extraordinary drawings and prints, this exhibition explores how six key post-war artists redefined art in Germany on both sides of the Iron Curtain.
All the artists in this exhibition came originally from eastern Germany and migrated to the West, the majority before the borders were sealed in 1961. Some had trained in East Germany, but it was in the West that their careers were established. As a generation, they came out of the experience of growing up in the aftermath of a Germany defeated in the Second World War, and its subsequent partition in 1949.
Much of their work is informed by the sense of collective guilt experienced by the German people over its recent past, the country’s physical and psychological destruction, and the division of the country by two opposing ideologies – the democracies of the free West and the Communist system of the Soviet bloc.
These remarkable works on paper, on public display for the first time, are on loan from the private collection of Count Christian Duerckheim. Half of them are by Georg Baselitz, with the remainder by Markus Lüpertz, Blinky Palermo, A R Penck, Sigmar Polke and Gerhard Richter. 34 of the works in the exhibition, including 17 by Baselitz, have been generously donated to the British Museum by Count Duerckheim.
The gift includes a group of 11 drawings by Baselitz from 1960 to the late 1970s, together with prints from the same period. They cover the principal phases of his career from the Pandemonium drawings of the early 1960s, the development of his ironic ‘Heroes’ in the mid-1960s, and the subsequent fracturing of his motifs to the eventual inversion of the motif from the late 1960s.
Other works on display include Richter’s Pin-up andInstallation drawings, the characteristic Ice Age-meets-cybernetics stick-figures of Penck, as well as sculptural drawings by Lüpertz and Palermo, and a drawing and sketchbook by Polke satirising the ‘economic miracle’ of post-war reconstruction in West Germany.
The donation completely transforms the Museum’s holdings of German post-war graphic art and enables the Museum to trace the history of drawings and printmaking in Germany from the time of Dürer to the present.



Ein neuer Type('A New Type'), 1965, Georg Baselitz (b.1938), grey and yellow ochre watercolour, charcoal, graphite and white pastel on paper. Presented to the British Museum by Count Christian Duerckheim, Reproduced by permission of the artist. © Georg Baselitz PreviousNext

1 of 6



Catalogue

Germany Divided: Baselitz and his generation
This title was published in January 2014 and includes 130 beautiful colour illustrations. Available in hardback with jacket.




Georg Baselitz: 'Am I supposed to be friendly?'
From his sculpture of a Hitler salute to his comments on women artists, Georg Baselitz has always been a provocative figure. After 50 years exploring the state of Germany, he tells Nicholas Wroe why he turned to America for his new show
The Guardian, Friday 14 February 2014 14.00 GMT
Jump to comments (13)


George Baselitz in his studio. Photograph: Martin Muller/Gagosian Gallery
In 1958 Georg Baselitz, then a 20-year-old art student recently arrived in West Berlin from East Germany, attended a touring exhibition of contemporary American painting staged at his university. "Until then I had lived first under the Nazis, and then in the GDR," he explains. "Modern art just did not occur so I knew almost nothing. Not about German expressionism, dadaism, surrealism or even cubism. And suddenly here was abstract expressionism. Paintings by Pollock, De Kooning, Guston, Still and many others, in the very buildings where I took classes every day. It was overwhelming. And not just for me. Even the professors had not seen this sort of work before."
Baselitz recalls that the artist he most admired from the exhibition was Jackson Pollock, but the one he understood best was Willem de Kooning, "because he was European". It was a distinction that would characterise his wider response to the show, and point towards the idiosyncratic road his career would take.
"The exhibition was a great shock not just because of the art," he says, "but also because while we knew that the British, the French and the Russians had something like culture, we didn't expect it from the Americans. For us the Americans were just show-offs who had absolutely nothing to offer intellectually. But now they had not only won the war, they also had the culture. This show was meant as an educational event for us misguided Germans, after which art, and artistic society, was meant to find the correct way. And most of my fellow students really did take something from the American exhibition and became integrated into the entire thing."
But for Baselitz the show marked the beginning of a different path. "I had to make a decision what to do with this new information. I knew that we had lost the war, and that we were lost. And I now also realised that I was not welcome in this culture because I was not a modern person. What I wanted to do was something that totally contradicted internationalism: I wanted to examine what it was to be a German now. My teachers were the first to tell me that I was wrong. They said it was anachronistic. We had lost the war, but now we were free and liberated and there were wonderful times ahead in a wonderful world. But I disagreed. I had another view."
In truth Baselitz had always been going his own way. He had been forced out of East Germany after being accused by the authorities of "political immaturity" at his first art school. Five years after arriving in the west, his debut gallery show attracted the attention of the police and he was fined for displaying an obscene picture that apparently depicted a masturbating dwarf. In the years since, both Baselitz's art (a 1980 Venice biennale sculpture was accused of representing a Hitler salute) and his comments (last year he was quoted in an interview claiming that women artists "simply don't pass the test"), have caused controversy. But now, over half a century after that Berlin exhibition, and his refusal to join in with the artistic orthodoxy, Baselitz has returned to Willem de Kooning in an exhibition entitled Farewell Bill, which opens in the Gagosian Gallery in London this week.
The new paintings are a marked departure from recent works. Described as Remixes, these involved a riffing – apparently at great speed – on some of his most renowned previous paintings, and were greeted by a decidedly muted critical reaction. In contrast the De Kooning paintings – part self-portraits part homage – are large and attentively worked and, in a rare synchronicity of timing, form just one of three exhibitions in London over the next few months that feature different aspects of Baselitz's career. In March the Royal Academy will stage Renaissance Impressions: Chiaroscuro Woodcuts from Baselitz's own collection, an important influence on both his style and subject matter. And Germany Divided: Baselitz and His Generation has just opened at the British Museum, featuring works on paper from 1960 to the late 70s from the collection of Count Christian Duerckheim, who has recently donated to the museum a significant quantity of work by Baselitz, as well as by other German artists such as Markus Lüpertz, Sigmar Polke andGerhard Richter.Licht wil raum mecht hern. Copyright Georg Baselitz. Courtesy of the Gagosian Gallery Photograph: georg baselitz

All three shows cast light on Baselitz as simultaneously an international artist and an intensely German artist, reflecting the way his place on the global scene is always linked to his own past. "The German title of the De Kooning show is 'Willem raucht nicht mehr'", says Baselitz, speaking in his vast lakeside studio, designed by superstar architects Herzog & de Meuron, just outside Munich. "It literally translates as 'Willem no longer smokes', which also means in German 'is no longer alive'." The individual painting titles are anagrammatic variations on this phrase. "Sometimes they sound like children's language, or sometimes they sound like old German," he says, but as the catalogue essay notes, you might need to understand the Saxony dialect of his birthplace to get all the references. This is a very typical touch from an artist who says: "while I have always moved around a lot, I've always taken materials from that place with me. That's been important." One of the most important of those materials he has carried around is his own name.
Baselitz was born Hans-Georg Kern in 1938 in the Saxony town of Deutschbaselitz. As an art student in West Berlin he adopted the name of his home town, where his father was a primary school teacher and Nazi party member, and from where Baselitz can remember seeing Dresden burning in the distance after the firebombing of 1945. A few weeks after that event his family were sheltering in the basement of a building just outside the town when it was hit by artillery. During a pause in the shelling – "which we thought was a ceasefire, but was in fact just a breakfast break" – his mother loaded a handcart and set out with her children to escape the Russians advancing from the east. Smoke was still coming out of Dresden's destroyed buildings as they passed through the city, just one family among thousands of people trekking on foot across the country. "We wanted to get to Bavaria because we were told that the Americans were there. But we only made it to a village just to the south of Dresden when the Russians arrived."
By the time he was a teenager it was clear that Baselitz was not fitting into the GDR system and, after being expelled from art school, he effectively became an economic refugee. "When I stopped being a student I stopped getting vouchers that would allow me to buy groceries. I was told if I worked in industry for a year I could return to art school as I would by then have the right mindset. But I knew that would destroy me and so I chose to go to the west."
He describes himself as very "impatient" when he arrived in West Berlin. "I wanted to see results immediately and didn't start out reasonably, I started out radically." He wrote manifestos, one of which culminated with the line "All writing is crap." He found inspiration in the Prinzhorn Collection of art made by the inmates of a mental institution – some of which had figured in the Nazis' Degenerate Art exhibitions – and he embraced the psychologically extreme work of Antonin Artaud. Although he says it wasn't his intention to upset people, when his painting The Big Night Down the Drain was seized by the police in 1963 he also realised "it was fun to do something that people would be upset about. But I also wanted to do something extraordinary and serious and I felt very privileged to have the artist's power to contradict. You feel like you are the founder of a new religion, even if your congregation is only your wife and kids."
Baselitz had married Elke Kretzschmar in 1962 and they have two sons. He says that throughout most of the 60s "the chances for an artist, let alone an artist like me, to impose yourself and to make a living from your art was nil". But during this period his art made remarkable progress. Rejecting the orthodoxy of what was called tachism – the European version of abstract expressionism – he not only introduced figures into his work, but began to use specific German archetypes, motifs and folklore. But Baselitz's shepherds, woodsmen, hunters and so on were not conventionally heroic – although the paintings would later be called the Helden (heroes) series. Rather they were bedraggled, broken and shambolic figures rendered in messily desolate landscapes.A New Type. Copyright Georg Baselitz. Courtesy of the British Museum

"In hindsight I think those pictures are complete pieces of art. But at the time it felt very chaotic and mixed up. I thought 'this can't be all' and I had to come up with new ideas." He set out on a series of strategies to disrupt both the work, and his making of the work. He painted with the canvas on the floor. (The floor of his studio closely resembles Jackson Pollock's on Long Island, with the difference that Baselitz doesn't insist that you wear protective shoes.) Then he started to "fracture" paintings into sections, with obvious echoes of a divided Germany, before he adopted the technique for which he is best known today, painting his motifs upside down – which directs both his, and the viewers, attention to the abstract aspects of the figurative work. He began to use his hands instead of brushes and when he moved to sculpting in wood he opted for the crude attack of the chainsaw over the precision chisel.
It was the row over his wooden sculpture at the 1980 Venice biennale that first brought him to an international audience. "I was in the German pavilion with Anselm Kiefer, another provocative artist, and it never occurred to me that my sculpture was doing a Hitler salute. But when a German TV channel reported on it they played the "Horst Wessel Song" [the Nazi anthem] to accompany their story. It was outrageous. But within a week I was getting approaches from all over the world to collaborate."
He says just being a German artist in the wider world could be contentious. "You sometimes felt that people were standing over you. Some of the prejudices that existed towards Germans were justified, but there were many prejudices. My work was also not really American-oriented, as Richter's is for example, and is instead very German and sometimes a bit obscene. Add that to being a kind of loud artist and then you will have encounters. Many of my advisers, especially my wife, say that I am too bold. But what am I supposed to do? Am I supposed to make statements that are politic? Am I supposed to be friendly? That's just not who I am."
No surprise then that he hasn't changed his mind about women artists. "Following the uproar I did think about this and it is a fact. I used to be a professor and 80% of my students were women. So there is a possibility for women and girls to study art, but they are less successful than the men. You can count and the numbers will prove me right." And he also casts a jaundiced eye over contemporary Germany, claiming it is rife with "injustice, vanity and dominance by the politicians" and hasn't yet properly dealt with its own history in terms of the Third Reich and the GDR. After reunification in 1990 he was not surprised to learn that the Stasi held a file on him, but was shocked that it was not for his correspondence with artists in the east when he was an adult, but his activities when at school. He is equally disillusioned with the stream of public intellectuals, such as Günter Grass, who took decades to acknowledge their membership of the SS. "These people dominated our culture. They were role models. They were mentioned in school textbooks. It is very depressing. It shows that no one is really free."Willem raucht nicht mehr. Copyright Georg Baselitz. Courtesy of the Gagosian Gallery Photograph: Georg Baselitz

But for all his provocations about women artists, two of them played important roles in his return to De Kooning. "I saw Tracey Emin's drawing at the biennale. I like her very much, and as I looked at her drawings I thought here was De Kooning. I had also seen De Kooning in a Richard Prince exhibition at the Guggenheim. Cecily Brown, another artist I like, also gets inspiration from De Kooning. This was all very interesting. When I look at the new art scene I find there is a lot of direct occupation – that is, not a copy, but it seems as if the art of the past has become the foundation of the present. And so I said I'm going to paint like De Kooning."
Baselitz turned 76 last month and still works every day in the studio: "I used to be able to paint all day and all night, but these days it is only for three hours in the morning. Working the wood is especially hard work, but two trunks have just been delivered from the Black Forest, so there is more to do." His current work in progress is a series of six, four-metre high, nude self-portraits. "Every now and again I do a self-portrait, and always in quite a strange manner. There are many models for the nude self-portrait: Lucian Freud, Schiele, Stanley Spencer, whose painting I don't like, but I did see a pencil nude portrait that was interesting. In a way it is a move away from De Kooning, I knew I had to do something enormous and silly."
Farewell Bill is at the Gagosian Gallery, London WC1, until 29 March.Germany Divided: Baselitz and His Generation is at the British Museum, London WC1, until 31 August. Renaissance Impressions: Chiaroscuro Woodcuts from the Collections of Georg Baselitz and the Albertina, Vienna is at the Royal Academy, London W1, from 15 March.







DW CultureDie Pinakotheken德國慕尼黑 ·


The Pinakothek der Moderne added seven new gems to their collection: The German painter and sculptor Georg Baselitz is one of the most important contemporary German artists. In honour of His Royal Highness Duke Franz of Bavaria, he donated seven works to the museum in Munich. Here they are:



































Georg Baselitz, upside-down artist of international renown, at 80 | Arts ...

www.dw.com/en/georg-baselitz-upside-down-artist-of-international.../a-42255012




Jan 23, 2018 - Georg Baselitz was thrown out of art school at the age of 18 because of his love for Picasso, and he has remained controversial and provocative ever since. To mark his 80th birthday, DWlooks back at his life and work.



Topsy turvy: German painter Georg Baselitz | All media content | DW ...


▶ 5:12

www.dw.com/en/topsy-turvy-german...georg-baselitz/av-42396412
Feb 3, 2018 German painter Georg Baselitz literally loves flipping things on their head. Now that he has turned eighty ...




Georg Baselitz turns 80 | All media content | DW | 27.01.2018


▶ 4:28

www.dw.com/en/georg-baselitz-turns-80/av-42223556
Jan 27, 2018 Georg Baselitz is viewed as one of the greatest living painters. For his 80th birthday, Basel's Fondation ...


Georg Baselitz


Georg Baselitz (born 23 January 1938, as Hans-Georg Kern, in Deutschbaselitz, Germany) is a German painter, sculptor and graphic artist. In the 1960s he became well known for his figurative, expressive paintings. Since 1969, he paints his subjects upside down in an effort to overcome the representational, content-driven character of his earlier work and stress the artifice of painting.[1] Drawing from a myriad of influences, including art of Soviet era illustration art, the Mannerist period and African sculptures, he developed his own, distinct artistic language.[2]
Since Baselitz grew up amongst the suffering and demolition of World War II, the concept of destruction plays a significant role in his life and work. These autobiographical circumstances have therefore returned throughout his whole oeuvre. In this context, the artist stated in an interview: "I was born into a destroyed order, a destroyed landscape, a destroyed people, a destroyed society. And I didn't want to reestablish an order: I had seen enough of so-called order. I was forced to question everything, to be 'naive', to start again."[3] By disrupting any given orders and breaking the common conventions of perception, Baselitz has formed his personal circumstances into his guiding artistic principles.[4] To this day, he still inverts all his paintings, which has become his unique and most defining feature in his work.



Contents [hide]
1Life
2Work
2.11957–1969
2.1.1Series of Heroes and Fractures
2.1.2Inverted paintings
2.21970–1975
2.31976–1980
2.41981–1989
2.51990–2009
2.62010–2013
2.7Since 2014
3Style
4Honours and awards
5Works
6Bibliography
7See also
8References
9External links

Centre Pompidou 2025. Benjamin Franklin Parkway;nuclear75, 《天梯:蔡国强的艺术》蔡國強新作「螢火蟲」點亮費城 Human-Powered ‘Fireflies’ Create a Nighttime Dreamscape

Centre Pompidou 2025.   Benjamin Franklin Parkway;nuclear75, 《天梯:蔡国强的艺术》蔡國強新作「螢火蟲」點亮費城   Human-Powered ‘Fireflies’ Create a Nighttime Dreamscape

On September 19, Cai Guo-Qiang, in partnership with the Canadian outdoor clothing brand Arc'teryx, executed a massive firework explosion on ...

Oct 15, 2025 — ... Pompidou — a daytime pyrotechnic fresco that will ignite the building's façade on October 22, 2025. A monumental farewell in the form of a ...


2017 The University of Chicago
Artist Cai Guo-Qiang 蔡國强 has amazed audiences around the world with his pyrotechnic artwork, including at the 2008 Beijing Olympics and with his celebrated work Sky Ladder.
In honor of #nuclear75, he will debut a new pyrotechnic piece Saturday at 3:20 p.m. above Regenstein Library at #UChicago. The piece will symbolize "the paradoxical nature of employing nuclear energy."


AFP News Agency 在動態時報相片相簿中新增了 1 張相片 — 在 Museo Nacional del Prado

Museo Nacional del Prado





Podrá visitarse hasta el próximo 4 de marzo en la sala C del edificio Jerónimos. En la sala D se proyecta un documental de veinte minutos, dirigido por Isabel Coixet con la colaboración de Samsung The Frame.

"繪畫 精神"展覽已經向公眾開放. 蔡國強在", 由Acciona贊助

到三月4日, 該大樓的c會議室可以訪問. 在d會議室, 由伊莎貝爾coixet領導的分鐘的紀錄片將在d會議室進行.


Cai Guo-Qiang es el primer artista contemporáneo que concibe obra…
MUSEODELPRADO.ES


"El espíritu de la pintura. Cai Guo-Qiang en el Prado" 25/10/2017 - 04/03/2018
https://www.museodelprado.es/…/50bb73ba-0e60-47da-86b9-e86a…




美国之音中文网
【著名艺术家蔡国强《萤火虫》作品专访】著名华人艺术家蔡国强在费城举办大型公共艺术展览《萤火虫》,庆祝本杰明·富兰克林大道建成100周年。和传统的大型庆典不同,蔡国强此次特意用来自家乡泉州的手工灯笼,和富有中国气息的人力三轮车,打造了一场公众可以参与的视觉盛宴。


天梯:蔡国强的艺术 - 豆瓣电影
https://movie.douban.com/subject/26679188/
《天梯:蔡国强的艺术》是当今世界最重要艺术家之一蔡国强的首部电影纪录片。既是一个从中国出发、成为具国际影响力艺术家的励志故事,也体现着新时代中国人的 ..



----

Benjamin Franklin Parkway - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin_Parkway

Benjamin Franklin Parkway is a scenic boulevard that runs through the cultural heart of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Named for Founding Father Benjamin ...

維基百科,自由的百科全書

費城藝術博物館台階頂部看班傑明·富蘭克林公園大道
班傑明·富蘭克林公園大道(Benjamin Franklin Parkway)是美國費城一條風景優美的林蔭大道,長一英里,呈對角線斜穿過市中心西北部文化區的柵格路網。得名於費城名人班傑明·富蘭克林。它起於費城市政廳,向西北經過洛根圓環(Logan Circle),止於費城藝術博物館前。

景點[編輯]

班傑明·富蘭克林公園大道是費城博物館區的脊柱。該市一些最著名的景點位於此處:聖伯多祿聖保祿聖殿主教座堂(Cathedral-Basilica of Sts. Peter and Paul)、斯旺紀念噴泉(Swann Memorial Fountain)、費城自由圖書館、富蘭克林科學博物館(Franklin Institute)、莫爾藝術設計學院(Moore College of Art and Design)、自然科學院(Academy of Natural Sciences)、羅丹博物館、艾金斯橢圓(Eakins Oval),以及費城藝術博物館
班傑明·富蘭克林公園大道也是一個室外雕塑花園。作品包括:奧古斯特·羅丹的「思想者」和「地獄之門」,羅伯特·印第安納的「愛」,亞歷山大·斯特林·考爾德的斯旺紀念噴泉的三河雕塑以及「莎士比亞紀念雕塑」,「聖女貞德」,華盛頓雕塑等。

市區重建[編輯]


CreditKirsten Luce for The New York Times



Human-Powered ‘Fireflies’ Create a Nighttime Dreamscape


For a public art project in Philadelphia, the artist Cai Guo-Qiang transformed pedicabs with paper lanterns ablaze.
By BARBARA POLLACK

https://cn.nytstyle.com/slideshow/20170919/t19fireflies-ss/zh-hant/?_ga=2.187029480.1558346025.1505835608-643230285.1487125568#1