2021年6月8日 星期二

芹澤銈介Keisuke Serizawa 1895-1984;静岡市立芹沢銈介美術館




198728 周日  靜岡市
訪市立的芹澤(金圭)(芹沢銈介)美術館。

·  芹沢けい介 - Wikipedia

ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/芹沢けいTranslate this page
芹沢 銈介(芹澤銈介、せりざわ けいすけ、「けい」は金偏に圭、1895年(明治28年)513 - 1984年(昭和59年)45)は、日本の染色工芸家。
人物 - ‎経歴 - ‎賞典 - ‎作品

·  静岡市立芹沢銈介美術館

www.seribi.jp/Translate this page
シリーズ・芹沢銈介の作品と収集 はたらく色 藍のすこやかさ芹沢銈介ののれんと世界の藍染め
芹沢 銈介(芹澤銈介、せりざわ けいすけ、「けい」は金偏に圭、1895(明治28年)5月13 - 1984(昭和59年)4月5)は、日本の染色工芸家
1931 同年創刊の民芸運動の同人雑誌「工藝」の装丁(型染布表紙)を担当、民芸運動に参加、大半の柳の著書も装丁した。



Keisuke Serizawa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Keisuke Serizawa (芹沢 銈介 Serizawa Keisuke?, May 13, 1895 - April 5, 1984) was a Japanese textile designer. In 1956, he was designated as a Living National Treasure for his katazome stencil dyeing technique by the Japanese government. Serizawa visited Okinawa several times and learned the Ryūkyū bingata techniques of dyeing. Serizawa was also a leading member of the mingei movement founded by Yanagi Sōetsu. His folk art includes kimono, paper prints, wall scrolls, folding screens, curtains, fans and calendars. Serizawa has also produced numerous masterpieces in illustrated books including Don Quixote, Vincent van Gogh and A Day at Mashiko. In 1981, the Municipal Serizawa Keisuke Art Museum was opened in the city of Shizuoka. Another museum, the Serizawa Keisuke Art and Craft Museum was opened in 1989 in Sendai.
“The distinguishing trait of Serizawa’s katazome method is the use of the starch mixture to create, not a colored area as is current in direct-dyeing process, but a blank, undyed one that forms a part of the pattern and that can later be colored by hand in multi-color or monochrome as the designer sees fit.”[1]

References

  1. ^ Keisuke Serizawa, The Stencil Artist, Volume1. Tokyo, Tsukiji Shokan Publishing Company , Ltd., distributed by the Maruzen Co., Ltd, 1967.

External links




人物

静岡市(現葵区)生まれで、静岡市名誉市民。文化功労者重要無形文化財「型絵染」の保持者(人間国宝)。20世紀日本の代表的な工芸家として内外から高く評価されており、民芸運動の主要な参加者でもあった。
オリジナリティあふれる作品群を生み出したほか、本の装丁など商業デザインも手がけ、また、その選美眼で世界各地の民芸品を蒐集した。東北地方、ことに仙台の街や鳴子温泉を愛したことでも知られる。
息子の芹沢長介考古学者として活躍したが、晩年は東北福祉大学芹沢銈介美術工芸館の館長を務めた。

経歴

  • 1895年 静岡市本通一丁目の呉服卸商西野屋(現在の日銀静岡支店附近)、大石角次郎の7人兄弟の次男として生まれる
  • 旧制静岡中学卒業
  • 1916年 東京高等工業学校(現在の東京工業大学)工業図案科 を卒業
  • 1917年 静岡市安西一丁目芹沢たよと婚姻、大石姓から芹沢姓となる。
  • 静岡県立工業試験場にて図案指導を担当するかたわら、商業デザインにも従事
  • 1927年 民芸運動柳宗悦の論文「工芸の道」に影響を受け終生交流。
  • 1928年 御大礼記念国産振興博覧会で沖縄の紅型(びんがた)に出会う
  • 1931年 同年創刊の民芸運動の同人雑誌「工藝」の装丁(型染布表紙)を担当、民芸運動に参加、大半の柳の著書も装丁した。
  • 1935年 東京蒲田に工房を構える
  • 1939年 沖縄で紅型の技法を学ぶ
  • 多摩造形芸術専門学校(現在の多摩美術大学)教授
  • 1949年 女子美術大学教授
  • 1955年 有限会社芹沢染紙研究所 開設
  • 1956年 4月に重要無形文化財「型絵染」の保持者(人間国宝)に認定
  • 1957年 鎌倉市津村の農家の離れを仕事場(小庵)とする
  • 1976年 フランス政府から招聘されパリで「芹沢銈介展」開催(国立グラン・パレ美術館)
  • 1980年-83年 『芹沢銈介全集』(全31巻、中央公論社)が刊行。
  • 1984年 逝去。享年88。

賞典

作品

芹沢は確かなデッサン力と紅型(びんがた)、江戸小紋や伊勢和紙などの各地の伝統工芸の技法をもとに、模様、植物、動物、人物、風景をモチーフとした、オリジナリティあふれる、和風でシックな作品を次々と生み出していった。
「型絵染」は芹沢が創始した技法で、布の代わりに、紙を型紙で染めたもの。「型絵染(かたえぞめ)」という呼び名は、人間国宝に認定された折に案出された。
その仕事は、着物、帯、夜具、暖簾(のれん)、屏風(びょうぶ)、壁掛け、本の装丁、カレンダー、ガラス絵、書、建築内外の装飾設計(大原美術館工芸館)など、多岐にわたる。
  • 「紺地杓子菜文麻地壁掛」(蝋染め:国画会に初出品)
  • 「いそほ物語絵巻」(新興民芸展に出品)
  • 『絵本どんきほうて』
  • 『法然上人絵伝』
  • 『東北窯めぐり』『益子日帰り』
  • 「四季曼荼羅二曲屏風」(ケネディ記念館のため)
  • 「荘厳飾り布」(知恩院大殿内陣)

書籍

  • 『染色の挑戦 芹沢銈介』平凡社〈別冊太陽 日本のこころ〉、2011年6月、作品群と蒐集品を紹介。
  • 『自選芹沢銈介作品集』全2巻 築地書館 1967-68 
  • 『型絵染 芹沢銈介珠玉作品原色図録』三一書房 1968
  • 『芹沢銈介手控帖』杉本健吉編 求竜堂 1969
  • 『装幀図案集』全3 吾八 1971-73
  • 『世界の民芸』浜田庄司,外村吉之介共著 写真: 菅野喜勝 朝日新聞社 1972
  • 『芹沢銈介人と仕事』ギャラリー吾八 1973
  • 『芹沢銈介 作品と身辺の品々』天満屋 1974
  • 『板絵の控』求竜堂 1976
  • 『新版絵本どんきほうて 型染』吾八 1976
  • 『芹沢銈介作品集』2,4 求竜堂 1978 
  • 芹沢銈介全集』全31巻 中央公論社 1980-83
  • 『歩 芹沢銈介の創作と蒐集』紫紅社 1982
  • 『沖縄風物』ギャラリー吾八 1985
  • 『芹沢銈介型紙集』日本民芸協会編 芸艸堂 1986 民芸叢書
  • 『芹沢銈介の文字絵・讃』芹沢長介,杉浦康平著 里文出版 1997
  • 『芹沢銈介作品集』芹沢長介監修 求龍堂 2006

商業デザイン

また、芹沢のデザインは商業デザインとして、 きもの、帯、屏風、のれん、卓布、風呂敷、装丁本、物語絵、ガラス絵、カレンダー、蔵書票など、様々な生活用品にも取り入れられ、今も庶民に愛されつづけている。

収集品

静岡市立芹沢銈介美術館
その一方、アジアを始め世界各国の民具民俗工芸品の「蒐集」でも知られ、その一端は各地の美術館で見ることができる。以下は世界各国の工芸品コレクションの一端である。
  • 日本の着物
    • 木綿地筒描き熨斗文夜着、緋縮緬地熨斗に南天文絞繍夜着、刺子火事半纏、津軽こぎん長着など
  • アジアの家具や民画、漆器や仏画、民族衣装、絞染の衣装
  • インドの木綿地絞り染め被衣
  • アフリカの仮面や木工品
  • 中南米の土偶や土器

外部リンク

Vincent van Gogh (1853–1890), ‘L'Homme à la pipe’. Etching, 1890. Tree Roots. Van Gogh’s last days. Vincent Van Gogh Superstar (2019 DW)

"First Steps".(1890)
By Vincent Van Gogh.Dutch post-impressionist
Metropolitan Museum of Art, NYC
可能是小孩、戶外和樹的藝術品
,078



Vincent van Gogh
 30 March 1853 – 29 July 1890
🌊 June 8 is #WorldOceanDay! With this painting by Vincent van Gogh, you can almost smell the sea air of the French Mediterranean coast – and if you look closely, you can even see evidence of it! Researchers have discovered grains of sand within the paint on the canvas, indicating that van Gogh actually painted it at the beach. How do you like this seascape?
🖼 Seascape near Les Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, 1888
🇳🇱 Dutch
📍 Van……
查看更多
可能是水和海洋的藝術品




TASCHEN contact@subscription.taschen-mail.com Unsubscribe

Wed, Jul 29, 10:24 PM (12 hours ago)
to me
TASCHEN
Meet Vincent van Gogh, one of the most famed tragic figures of 19th‑century art. This lush tome collects all his 871 paintings, alongside writings and essays, charting the life and work of a master who continues to tower over art to this day. From Sunflowers and The Starry Night to Self-Portrait with Bandaged Ear, celebrate an artist uniquely dexterous in the representation of texture and mood, light and place.
TASCHEN
“A magical book that says it all.”
—  La Provence, Paris 
TASCHEN
Van Gogh.
The Complete Paintings
              
US$ 50
    
Buy now

03 ...
www.teleboy.ch › tv-guide › vincent-...


View or record Vincent Van Gogh Superstar free online – Vincent van Gogh is famous around the globe. His vibrant paintings and tragic life are objects of ...




British Museum
This is the only etching Vincent van Gogh ever made – it shows Dr Paul Gachet who was the artist’s doctor during the final weeks of his life.
Van Gogh died #onthisday in 1890.
Zoom in to see the incredible detail of artworks like this on our Collection online – just look out for the : http://ow.ly/Ng9P30qYhEB
This work is also included in our display of Impressionist prints, which captures the vibrant work of artists in 19th-century France – discover more in this online exhibition: http://ow.ly/jE5X30qYhIG
Vincent van Gogh (1853–1890), ‘L'Homme à la pipe’. Etching, 1890.





****

Tree Roots
Vincent van Gogh - Tree Roots and Trunks (F816).jpg
ArtistVincent van Gogh
Year1890
Catalogue
MediumOil on canvas
Dimensions50.0 cm × 100.0 cm (19.7 in × 40.6 in)
LocationVan Gogh MuseumAmsterdam
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_Roots







Van Gogh’s last days

Elliott Verdier for The New York Times
A discovery in France could shed light on how Vincent van Gogh spent his final days. Wouter van der Veen, a researcher, found a clue on a postcard from 1905, above, as to the precise location where the artist painted “Tree Roots,” thought to be his last piece.
“Tree Roots” was painted on a main road in Auvers-sur-Oise, north of Paris, Mr. van der Veen found. The tangled, gnarled tree roots and stumps can still be seen in the slope of a hill there today. The painting, he said, “is a farewell note in colors.”

Frank Lloyd Wright /Architect Without Limits


2009.5.
Architecture

Architect Without Limits

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York City.

Published: May 14, 2009

Frank Lloyd Wright died half a century ago, but people are still fighting over him.

Skip to next paragraph

Blog

ArtsBeat
ArtsBeat

The latest on the arts, coverage of live events, critical reviews, multimedia extravaganzas and much more. Join the discussion.

Chester Higgins Jr./The New York Times

The original model of the Guggenheim Museum in the exhibition “Frank Lloyd Wright: From Within Outward.”

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

A model of Beth Sholom Synagogue in Elkins Park, Pa.

Tony Cenicola/The New York Times

A model of the Gordon Strong Automobile Objective and Planetarium, which was never built.

The extraordinary scope of his genius, which touched on every aspect of American life, makes him one of the most daunting figures of the 20th century. But to many he is still the vain, megalomaniacal architect, someone who trampled over his clients’ wishes, drained their bank accounts and left them with leaky roofs.

So “Frank Lloyd Wright: From Within Outward,” which opens on Friday at the Guggenheim Museum, will be a disappointment to some. The show offers no new insight into his life’s work. Nor is there any real sense of what makes him so controversial. It’s a chaste show, as if the Guggenheim, which is celebrating its 50th anniversary, was determined to make Wright fit for civilized company.

The advantage of this low-key approach is that it puts the emphasis back where it belongs: on the work. There are more than 200 drawings, many never exhibited publicly before. More than a dozen scale models, some commissioned for the show, give a strong sense of the lucidity of his designs and the intimate relationship between building and landscape that was such a central theme of his art.

Taken as a whole, the exhibition conveys not only the remarkable scope of his interests, which ranged from affordable housing to reimagining the American city, but also the astonishing cohesiveness of that vision

— an achievement that has been matched by only one or two other architects in the 20th century.

One way to experience the show is as a straightforward tour of Wright’s masterpieces. Organized by Thomas Krens and David van der Leer, it is arranged in roughly chronological order, so that you can spiral up through the highlights of his career: the reinvention of the suburban home and the office block, the obsession with car culture, the increasingly outlandish urban projects.

There is a stunning plaster model of the vaultlike interior of Unity Temple, built in Oak Park between 1905 and 1908. Just a bit farther up the ramp, another model painstakingly recreates the Great Workroom of the Johnson Wax Headquarters in Racine, Wis., with its delicate grid of mushroom columns and milky glass ceiling.

Such tightly composed, inward-looking structures contrast with the free-flowing spaces that we tend to associate with Wright’s fantasy of a democratic, agrarian society.

But as always with Wright, the complexity of his approach reveals itself only after you begin to fit the pieces together. For Wright, the singular masterpiece was never enough. His aim was to create a framework for an entire new way of life, one that completely redefined the relationships between individual, family and community. And he pursued it with missionary zeal.

Wright went to extreme lengths to sell his dream of affordable housing for the masses, tirelessly promoting it in magazines.

The second-floor annex shows a small sampling of its various incarnations, including an elaborate model of the Jacobs House (1936-37), its walls and floors pulled apart and suspended from the ceiling on a system of wires and lead weights. One of Wright’s earliest Usonian houses, the one-story Jacobs structure in Madison, Wis., was made of modest wood and brick and organized around a central hearth. Its L-shape layout framed a rectangular lawn, locking it into the landscape, so that the homeowner remained in close touch with the earth.

The ideas Wright explored in such projects were eventually woven into grander urban fantasies, first proposed in Broadacre City and later in The Living City project. In both, Usonian communities were dispersed over an endless matrix of highways and farmland, punctuated by the occasional residential tower.

The subtext of these plans, of course, was Wright’s war with the city. To Wright, the congested neighborhoods of the traditional city were anathema to the spirit of unbridled individual freedom. His alternative, shaped by the car, represented a landscape of endless horizons. Sadly, it was also a model for suburban sprawl.

Wright continued to explore these themes until the end of his life, even as his formal language evolved. A model of the Gordon Strong Automobile Objective and Planetarium captures his growing obsession with the ziggurat and the spiral. A tourist destination that was planned for Sugarloaf Mountain, Md., but never built, the massive concrete structure coiled around a vast planetarium. The project combines his love of cars and his fascination with primitive forms, as if he were striving to weave together the whole continuum of human history.

In his 1957 Plan for Greater Baghdad, Wright went a step further, adapting his ideas to the heart of the ancient city. The plan is centered on a spectacular opera house enclosed beneath a spiraling dome and crowned by a statue of Alladin. Set on an island in the Tigris, the opera house was to be surrounded by tiers of parking and public gardens. A network of roadways extends like tendrils from this base, weaving along the edge of the river and tying the complex to the old city.

Just across the river, another ring of parking, almost a mile in diameter, encloses a new campus for Baghdad University.

Wright’s fanciful design was never built, but it demonstrates the degree to which he remained distrustful of urban centers. Stubborn to the end, he saw the car as the city’s salvation rather than its ruin. The cosmopolitan ideal is supplanted by a sprawling suburbia shaded by palms and date trees.

And what of the Guggenheim? Some will continue to see it as an example of Wright’s brazen indifference to the city’s history. With its aloof attitude toward the Manhattan street grid, the building still pushes buttons.

For his part, Wright saw the spiral as a symbol of life and rebirth. The reflecting pool at the bottom of his rotunda represented a seed, part of his vision of an organic architecture that sprouts directly from the earth.

Yet Wright also needed the city to make his vision work. The force of the spiral’s upward thrust gains immeasurably from the grid that presses in on all sides. The ramps, too, can be read as an extension of the street life outside. Coiled tightly around the audience, they replicate the atmosphere of urban intensity that Wright supposedly so abhorred.

Or maybe not. In preparing for the show, the Guggenheim’s curators decided to remove the frosting from a window at the lobby’s southwest corner. The window frames a vista over a low retaining wall toward the corner of 88th Street and Fifth Avenue, where you can see people milling around the exterior of the building. It is the only real view out of the lobby, and it visually locks the building into the streetscape, making the city part of the composition.

I choose to see it as a gesture of love, of a sort, between Wright and the city he claimed to hate.